Guidelines for local research ethics committees.
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
The role of local research ethics committees.
audit works we might expect an improvement when comparing 1990 with the 1987 report. Direct comparison is often difficult and infrequently made by the authors. Necropsy rates have risen from 35% to 47%, although necropsy reports were considered to be poor in 25% of cases and reached the right doctors in only 75%. The proportion of patients examined by a consultant surgeon before operation did n...
متن کاملLocal Research Ethics Committees can audit ethical standards in research.
OBJECTIVES To show that a Local Research Ethics Committee (LREC) can carry out an audit of ethical standards in research. To find out if a researcher met certain ethical standards in recruiting subjects for clinical trials and in obtaining their consent. DESIGN Postal questionnaire. SETTING Clinical research by one doctor during one year. SUBJECTS Eleven patients entered in clinical trial...
متن کاملResponses by four Local Research Ethics Committees to submitted proposals.
BACKGROUND There is relatively little research concerning the processes whereby Local Research Ethics Committees discharge their responsibilities towards society, potential participants and investigators. OBJECTIVES To examine the criteria used by LRECs in arriving at their decisions concerning approval of research protocols through an analysis of letters sent to investigators. DESIGN Four ...
متن کاملThe annual reports of Local Research Ethics Committees.
Each Local Research Ethics Committee (LREC) is expected to produce an annual report for its establishing authority. Reports from 145 LRECs were examined with regard to (a) whether the committees were working within the terms of the most recent guidelines from the Department of Health and (b) observations on the role of LRECs with particular reference to accountability. Most LRECs had produced a...
متن کاملResearch ethics committees and paternalism.
In this paper the authors argue that research ethics committees (RECs) should not be paternalistic by rejecting research that poses risk to people competent to decide for themselves. However it is important they help to ensure valid consent is sought from potential recruits and protect vulnerable people who cannot look after their own best interests. The authors first describe the tragic deaths...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: BMJ
سال: 1992
ISSN: 0959-8138,1468-5833
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.304.6837.1293